Criteria | Poor | Moderate | Excellent |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Relevance: Addresses ideas, topics, or practices that are highly relevant and significant to teaching and learning at the university level. | | | | | |
Evidence: Cites previous scholarly work and integrates theory and/or quantitative or qualitative assessment data. The presentation does not rest on the presenter’s experience. | | | | | |
Action: Offers content applicable to a variety of disciplines and campus sizes by sharing innovative and creative thinking. Proposal covers new ground or is a significant advancement or application of well-documented practice. | | | | | |
Appropriate: The session proposal is likely to accomplish the stated outcomes. It is appropriate for the track selected by the presenter. | | | | | |
Presentation: The session is engaging and interactive. It includes the thoughtful use of active learning and engagement activities synergistic with the proposed content and session goals. | | | | | |